Key points that confirm Nairobi has been attacked using Information Warfare by hostile foreign services include the following
- Publication of information which the International Criminal Court threw out as un-substantive, sensational, and completely fictitious, coarse body of information misconstrued for evidence by the ICC the Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda.
- Consistent allegation that the Military of Kenya (Kenya Defense Forces) was deployed to conduct operations against ethnic civilians.
- Choice of time to publish and intent to use information already disregarded/dismissed by the ICC judges on grounds they are not admissible in court nor meet minimum threshold of review-able evidence. (Summarily ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has published fallacies/lies, that the ICC refused to listen. This itself is criminal, contemptuous, and unethical).
Analysis
Kenya Defense Forces Military Intelligence has always maintained KDF is a professional, coherent, tight body whose reputation across the world remains intact.
The Military of Kenya also confirmed that during the 2007-2008 violence, none of its officers deserted duty to rescue family members as alleged by the ICC prosecutor.
KDF has been instrumental in peace mission in East Africa specifically in South Sudan and in Somalia hence it’s ranks operate and subscribe to the force command structure.
What prompted the International Criminal Court Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to publish literature that has been rejected by the judges and a coarse body of information labelled as completely fictitious by lawyers and judges?
Information war combined with the Cyber-warfare infrastructure amplifies the domino effect of psychological warfare attacks.
Kenya is under attack by Western Intelligence Services that sponsored the ICC cases. Failure to prosecute president Kenyatta has not gone down well with the OTP masters.
Discrediting the presidency and injuring his person and office through the delicate and quite explosive online environment could suffice to cause ethnic tensions on social media. The same could give terrorists opportunity to speed up their plans and attack the country and further discredit the government.
The objective is to amplify the effect through the cyber environment, injure the person of President Kenyatta, discredit the government, the presidency, and whip emotions across the country through sensationalized reporting across the cyber-space.
Hence, it is reasonable enough to describe the ICC Prosecutor as a person serving other interests that seek to destabilize the Republic of Kenya.
That Fatou Bensouda is lacking in her professional conduct, that she is careless, malicious, and lacks knowledge of professional ethics when carrying out her duties as ICC Prosecutor.
