ICC Prosecutor embarrassed the Hague based court financiers by admitting she had no evidence to hold a case against president Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya.
Western and European Union diplomats warned Nairobi of dire consequences if the elected to ‘jail-headed duo’ of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto.
Various intelligence cables exchanged by foreign offices in Kenya and their masters besides documents verified as authentic and authored by British diplomats suggesting the speedy prosecution of Kenyatta besides skewed evidence are indicative of meddling and political aspects of the whole case.
On Friday 5th 2014, the ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda told the court that she had no evidence to prosecute and that she was only hoping to get hold of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s list of properties, bank details, and financial transactions during the 2007-2008 election violence.
While she maybe clutching on straws, Fatou Bensouda maybe very sure that there is indeed something that she can use against Kenyatta if she has access to these documents.
President Kenyatta of Kenya has not gone to the court since he was elected president.
The prosecutor prayed the court to adjourn the case against Kenyatta indefinitely.
The Wests anti-Kenyatta push seemed packed with facts and very credible evidence that could put Kenyatta behind bars.
It was evident in the zeal and confidence at the office of the prosecutor.
The attrition of witnesses and the subsequent overview that they were not credible besides recanting their sworn affidavits confirm Nairobi outsmarted ICC Prosecutor.
It was a money game and fixing each other became the thumb rule. The highest bidder and the one with an edge won the game. Bensouda over relied on criminals and active Mungiki thugs who wanted money.
Kenyatta has money and friends with billions to spend on such a high stakes game. Even the West resources could not match the capability to stymie their covert political game, and they lost blindly as they began playing it.
