Counter Intelligence and Policing Measures for the Government of Kenya
Introduction
The criminal intelligence service and the national security service in Kenya are responding to increasing terrorist attacks in the country reactively rather than proactively. Reactive measures are instinctive and hardly suffice to eliminate threats neither procure long-term solutions to insecurity; instead, reactive measures victimize, stigmatize members of the society besides, create a wide wedge between the police community and the civil society, particularly in the areas where reactive measures are enacted.
Research by intelligence and counter terrorism experts, one of the most obvious significant deficiencies exposed by Sunday 1st July 2012 terror attack in Garissa besides previous numerous terror attacks in Kenya, is the weakness within our intelligence agencies. These weaknesses enabled the terrorists to plan, develop, and execute their attack without detection.
Elements of Knowledge to prevent future terrorist activity





























We in Kenya are sick & tired of hearing this boring intelligence story all the time that terrorist attack, that security agencies knew about it before hand and nothing is done about it, that is where the problem lies , Hiring more police Recruits will not help especially when they are recruited from a corrupt process