Ethiopia’s Stance on Somaliland Recognition
Ethiopia has clarified that it does not intend to recognize Somaliland as an independent state, despite signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the breakaway region in January 2024. The agreement has raised concerns and triggered diplomatic tensions between Addis Ababa and Mogadishu, with Ethiopia emphasizing its commitment to respect Somalia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. This stance comes amidst efforts by the international community to facilitate dialogue between the two sides to restore order and integration in the region.
The MoU between Ethiopia and Somaliland includes provisions for the construction of a naval base and port in Somaliland in exchange for the ceding of 20 kilometers of Red Sea coastline to Ethiopia. However, Ethiopia has clarified to diplomats that the agreement does not include a promise of diplomatic recognition for Somaliland. This has led to concerns from the United Nations, which has not been supportive of Somaliland’s aspirations for independence.
Somaliland, on the other hand, is proceeding with the implementation of the MoU and expects Ethiopia to honor the agreement. President Muse Bihi Abdi has been advocating for international recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state. Despite international partners’ refusal to recognize Somaliland for the past 30 years, the region remains determined to pursue its independence aspirations.
In response to Ethiopia’s actions, Somalia has accused Ethiopia of undermining its territorial integrity and sovereignty. Somalia has vowed to respond with equal force, raising concerns about potential escalation in tensions. The United Nations has called for calm, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and respect for Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The situation highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics in the Horn of Africa and the delicate balance of power in the region.
High-Level Talks between Somalia and Kenya (Trade, Security, and Cooperation)
H.E. Hamza Abdi Barre, the Prime Minister of Somalia, visited Nairobi from 6th to 8th May 2024, at the invitation of H.E. Rigathi Gachagua, Deputy President of Kenya. The visit aimed to strengthen bilateral ties and discuss regional and international issues of mutual concern. During their meeting on 7th May 2024, the leaders emphasized the long-standing friendship between Kenya and Somalia and explored avenues to enhance cooperation. H.E. Rigathi Gachagua was joined by several Cabinet Secretaries, while H.E. Hamza Abdi Barre was accompanied by key ministers from Somalia.

The visit followed the 3rd session of the Kenya Somalia Joint Commission for Cooperation (JCC) held from 3rd to 6th May 2024. The Ministerial delegations, led by H.E. Dr. Musalia Mudavadi and H.E. Ahmed Moalin Fiqi, discussed various sectors of bilateral cooperation, including trade, defence, internal security, and education. Both leaders highlighted the need to deepen partnerships on the international stage and agreed to enhance consultations for a stronger presence in multilateral forums, prioritizing the interests of the Global South.
H.E. Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre expressed condolences for the recent floods in Kenya, reaffirming Somalia’s solidarity with the affected communities. The leaders discussed ways to enhance trade and investment between the two countries, aiming to remove barriers to facilitate the movement of goods and people. They also emphasized the importance of cooperation in the Blue Economy, particularly in the trade of fish and fishery products.
Security cooperation was another key focus, with both leaders committing to fight terrorism and other transnational crimes. They called for strengthened cooperation in border security and capacity building for police. The leaders reiterated the significance of the JCC in advancing mutual interests and strengthening bilateral relations, particularly in the context of Somalia’s admission to the East African Community, which is seen as an opportunity to enhance regional integration efforts.
Kenya’s Diplomatic Drive for Regional Support
In a bid to secure regional support and bolster its candidate’s chances, the Kenyan government has embarked on a diplomatic campaign to persuade Somalia to withdraw its African Union Commission (AUC) candidate in favor of Kenya’s nominee, former Prime Minister Raila Odinga. This move comes as Kenya intensifies its lobbying efforts ahead of the AUC elections, aiming to position Odinga for the influential position. Kenya’s Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua held talks with Somalia’s Prime Minister on May 7, reportedly urging Somalia to drop its candidate, Fawzia Yusuf Adam. This meeting forms part of Kenya’s broader diplomatic drive to rally support for Odinga, who declared his candidacy for the AUC chairmanship on February 15, 2024.

The Executive Council of the African Union Commission has resolved that the next chairperson will likely come from Eastern Africa, offering a favorable backdrop for Odinga’s bid. Kenya has embarked on a “shuttle diplomacy” mission across the continent to garner support for Odinga, emphasizing his political experience and vision for Africa. However, reports suggest that Somalia is aligning with Djibouti to counter Kenya’s efforts, presenting a potential obstacle to Odinga’s candidacy.
The AUC chairmanship is pivotal for regional power dynamics, given the Commission’s role in AU governance and decision-making. Kenya’s lobbying efforts, including its appeal to Somalia, underscore the significance of the AUC leadership race. With the application deadline approaching on August 6, 2024, Kenya is expected to continue its diplomatic overtures to bolster Odinga’s bid. The outcome of these efforts and Somalia’s stance could significantly influence the race for the AUC chairmanship, shaping the future trajectory of the AU.
Tigray’s Stance on Sudan Conflict
The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) has refuted claims of its involvement in the conflict in Sudan, dismissing them as baseless. The Tigray Interim Administration stated that it has never been involved in the conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has resulted in numerous casualties. The TPLF emphasized that these allegations are aimed at garnering international support for the RSF’s campaign against the SAF, characterizing the claims as unfounded and based on imagination.

The RSF, a paramilitary group previously aligned with the Sudanese army, has accused the TPLF of having close ties with the SAF, which is struggling to contain the conflict. The RSF’s claims include allegations of foreign involvement in supporting the SAF, spanning various operational aspects such as air force operations, engineering tasks, and information warfare. The RSF has claimed to have documented the deaths of foreign mercenaries supporting the SAF, further complicating the conflict’s narrative.
The civil war in Sudan, which began in April 2023, has divided the military government into two factions, the SAF and the RSF, with both sides accusing each other of seeking foreign support. The Sudanese army previously accused the United Arab Emirates (UAE) of supporting the RSF and facilitating the transfer of supplies through countries like Uganda. Amidst this turmoil, the Tigray Interim Administration has affirmed its commitment to not intervene in Sudan’s internal conflict, recognizing Sudan as a sanctuary for Tigrayans and highlighting Sudan’s efforts to aid distressed refugees.
The conflict in Sudan not only poses a humanitarian crisis with thousands dead but also presents significant security and geopolitical challenges for the region. Allegations of foreign involvement and the presence of mercenaries add complexity to an already volatile situation, raising concerns about the potential for further escalation and regional instability. The denial of involvement by the TPLF and the accusations against the SAF and foreign entities underscore the intricate web of interests at play in the Sudanese conflict, highlighting the need for diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis and prevent further bloodshed.































